![]() ![]() In a significant change to AR 600-20, paragraph 4-14c, now codifies the customary prohibition of personal or intimate relationships between NCOs (corporal through command sergeant major) and junior enlisted service members (private through specialist). Previously, certain types of personal relationships between officers and enlisted personnel were prohibited in writing, while long standing military tradition proscribed personal relationships between NCOs and junior enlisted personnel. The Army also prohibits relationships between certain categories of Soldiers, regardless of any command or unit affiliation. This is why the Army expressly prohibits relationships that meet any of the five criteria. So, even if there is nothing wrong occurring, the simple perception among others makes these relationships inappropriate.Īny relationship between Soldiers of different ranks, which is too personal in nature, will cause problems in a unit - it's simply a matter of time. You are a Soldier who enjoys working on computers, so you help out the battalion command sergeant major with his home computer during your free time.Īny of these situations could cause a problem within a unit if other Soldiers or leaders perceiving favoritism or personal gain between the parties involved. You are a sergeant who calls select Soldiers by their first names. You are an officer who regularly hangs out with some of your subordinates to watch the game. None of these relationships require any element of a sexual nature they simply have to cause an actual or perceived situation, which negatively impacts a unit's good order and discipline. If any of these criteria are met, the parties involved may be subject to Uniformed Code of Military Justice action under Article 92 as a violation of a lawful general regulation. The standard for what constitutes an inappropriate leader-subordinate relationship hasn't changed in the new AR 600-20 4-14b which states, relationships, (both opposite-gender and same-gender) are prohibited if they: - Compromise, or appear to compromise, the integrity of supervisory authority or the chain of command - Cause actual or perceived partiality or unfairness - Involve, or appear to involve, the improper use of rank or position for personal gain - Are, or are perceived to be, exploitative or coercive in nature - Create an actual or clearly predictable adverse impact on discipline, authority, morale or the ability of the command to accomplish its mission. 6, so commanders and Soldiers need to be aware of the new elements in the regulation to ensure compliance and to limit confusion.ĪR 600-20, paragraph 4-14, defines relationships between Soldiers of different ranks and seeks to clarify proper personal and professional relationships within the Army. The Army has recently released an update to Army Regulation 600-20, Army Command Policy, which better defines these issues for leaders and Soldiers. Soldiers and leaders often discuss terms such as fraternization, inappropriate relationships and prohibited relationships interchangeably causing plenty of confusion. One of the most common gossip topics in the Army concerns the perception of proper and improper relationships. And, even better, it's never out of season. Gossip - arguably a favorite "sport" in our society - ranks right up there with football and basketball for things we like to talk about.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |